Group Management Toolbox |
In another life, I have taught Organizational Behavior where the focus is on managing group dynamics. While that is not the focus of this class, I have found that students often benefit from a "mini" toolbox drawn from those materials. Team management is a fundamental task in implementing strategies and for that reason is not beyond the scope of this course. While I dont intend to use class time to discuss these issues, I hope these materials prove to be useful.
The following pages include:
Your primary tools for managing group dynamics are incentives, roles, and norms. The following is an explanation of how you can use the materials on the following pages to improve your effectiveness.
Incentives/Rewards.
These are group or individual based rewards that promote
cooperation and effort among group members. Organizations
are notoriously poor at providing powerful group-based
incentives. In addition, the individual incentives
offered may actually undermine cooperation with a group
or team. Here, I offer you the option of peer appraisal
if you choose to strengthen the incentive structure for
your team if you feel it is necessary (see six steps to
solving free rider problems).As your group meets for the first few times, you will be setting norms. This includes norms for performance, norms for sharing the work, norms for dealing with conflict, norms for attending meetings, and norms for how to treat others ideas. In other words, the first few meetings are crucial for establishing how your group will work throughout the semester. Here are a few ideas to help you head off and/or deal with free rider problems.
Example: At the end of the semester each person will complete a worksheet to allocate points to all other members. The following example illustrates the process for a group with 4 members with an average of A-: The rater allocates a total pool of points to all other members. The points to be allocated equals 10*(group size-1). In a group of four, each member would have 30 points to allocate to the others. Each member allocates so that major contributors get more points while others get fewer. The following example illustrates what the results might look like:
Raters |
Members |
Total |
|||
Anne |
Bill |
Connie |
David |
||
| Anne | 13 |
4 |
13 |
30 |
|
| Bill | 17 |
3 |
10 |
30 |
|
| Connie | 14 |
7 |
9 |
30 |
|
| David | 16 |
10 |
4 |
30 |
|
| Average | 15.67 |
10.00 |
3.67 |
10.67 |
40 |
| Adjusted Group Grade | A |
A- |
B+ |
A- |
|
Note: In order to change to peer appraisal at any point in the semester, I need the request in writing with signatures from at least 75% of the group members.
This worksheet is to help you divide the work and organize your time at your first group meeting. It may also help you to put together your project proposal.
Task |
Who |
When |
Status |
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. | |||
| 4. | |||
| 5. | |||
| 6. | |||
| 7. | |||
| 8. | |||
| 9. | |||
| 10. | |||
| 11. | |||
| 12. | |||
| 13. | |||
| 14. | |||
| 15. | |||
| 16. | |||
| 17. | |||
| 18. | |||
| 19. | |||
| 20. |